Skip to content

Rollup of 4 pull requests #90695

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Nov 9, 2021
Merged

Rollup of 4 pull requests #90695

merged 10 commits into from
Nov 9, 2021

Conversation

GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

Meziu and others added 10 commits November 2, 2021 08:44
@Meziu
ARMv6K Horizon OS panic change
9cab312
@Meziu
Updated backtrace submodule
d379147
@matthiaskrgr
use filter(|x| matches!(..)) instead of filter_map(|x| match x ... =>…
ed7e438 
… Some(xy))
@GuillaumeGomez
Fix last doc code comment being removed if it only had one character
e8f1d57
@GuillaumeGomez
Add test for removed one character last line in rustdoc
aa6f6f4
@lnicola
⬆️ rust-analyzer
1e56dd4
@GuillaumeGomez
Rollup merge of rust-lang#90494 - Meziu:armv6k-3ds-target, r=sanxiyn
f07f800 
ARMv6K Horizon OS panic change

After a small change to `backtrace-rs` ([rust-lang#448](rust-lang/backtrace-rs#448)), `PanicStrategy::Unwind` is now fully supported.
@GuillaumeGomez
Rollup merge of rust-lang#90652 - matthiaskrgr:unnnec_filter_map, r=j…
9318810 
…yn514

use filter(|x| matches!(..)) instead of filter_map(|x| match x ... => Some(xy))
@GuillaumeGomez
Rollup merge of rust-lang#90657 - GuillaumeGomez:one-char-last-line-r…
d9fc7d1 
…emoved, r=jyn514

Fix bug with `#[doc]` string single-character last lines

Fixes rust-lang#90618.

This is because `.iter().all(|c| c == '*')` returns `true` if there is no character checked. And in case the last line has only one character, it simply returns `true`, making the last line behind removed.
@GuillaumeGomez
Rollup merge of rust-lang#90689 - lnicola:rust-analyzer-2021-11-08, r…
2709524 
…=lnicola

⬆️ rust-analyzer

r? ``@ghost``
@rustbot rustbot added the rollup A PR which is a rollup label Nov 8, 2021
@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member Author

@bors: r+ p=4 rolup=never

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Nov 8, 2021

📌 Commit 2709524 has been approved by GuillaumeGomez

@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Nov 8, 2021
@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member Author

@bors: rollup=never

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Nov 8, 2021

⌛ Testing commit 2709524 with merge 839e685abf0334d9b311fe8df73d30c861981d3c...

@bors bors mentioned this pull request Nov 8, 2021
Merged
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Nov 8, 2021

💥 Test timed out

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Nov 8, 2021
@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

A job failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member Author

@bors retry

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Nov 8, 2021
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Nov 9, 2021

⌛ Testing commit 2709524 with merge c57704f...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Nov 9, 2021

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: GuillaumeGomez
Pushing c57704f to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Nov 9, 2021
@bors bors merged commit c57704f into rust-lang:master Nov 9, 2021
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.58.0 milestone Nov 9, 2021
@bors bors mentioned this pull request Nov 9, 2021
Closed
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (c57704f): comparison url.

Summary: This change led to moderate relevant mixed results 🤷 in compiler performance.

  • Moderate improvement in instruction counts (up to -0.5% on full builds of deeply-nested-async)
  • Small regression in instruction counts (up to 0.3% on incr-unchanged builds of html5ever)

If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf.

Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this perf run, please indicate this with @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged along with sufficient written justification. If you cannot justify the regressions please open an issue or create a new PR that fixes the regressions, add a comment linking to the newly created issue or PR, and then add the perf-regression-triaged label to this PR.

@rustbot label: +perf-regression

@rustbot rustbot added the perf-regression Performance regression. label Nov 9, 2021
@GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez deleted the rollup-kxvvw4o branch November 9, 2021 09:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. perf-regression Performance regression. rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
1.58.0
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
8 participants
@GuillaumeGomez @bors @rust-log-analyzer @rust-timer @rustbot @Meziu @matthiaskrgr @lnicola